Tag Archives: Resilient Cities

Where do we go from here? Pop Thoughts and Some Wicked Notes @ the 2014 Philippine Society for Public Administration InterConf

“The Bamboo that bends is better than the oak that resists.”
–Japanese Proverb

I got an invitation from the Philippine Society for Public Administration (PSPA) last month to share the outputs and insights of the UNESCO Laoag Knowledge Lab forum-workshop.

The UNESCO Know Lab event was attended by urban planners, mayors, futurists, disaster risk management and reduction officers, academics, researchers and social activists from different primary and secondary cities and organizations of the country to explore and deliberate alternatives and preferred futures for Philippine cities.

It was organized by the UNESCO National Commission of the Philippines, Northwestern University. the City Government of Laoag and the Center for Engaged Foresight in partnership with the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies at Tamkang University (Taiwan), the Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies, University of Hawaii (United States), the Heal Being Society of South Korea, (Seoul) and SMART Philippines.

For more information, the official report is available here in PDF format: Resilient Cities Report May 2014

But you may also want to check these links:

http://en.unesco.org/events/resilient-cities-brighter-futures

http://unesco.gov.ph/content/article/Social%20and%20Human%20Sciences

http://r01.pia.gov.ph/index.php?article=381401085177

http://www.manilatimes.net/resilient-cities-brighter-futures/100447/

http://blauearth.com/tag/resilient-cities-brighter-futures/

http://unescoapceiu.org/en/m/news_view.php?divGubun=m35&wr_id=162&Page=1

http://theilocostimes.blogspot.com/2014/05/lc-to-host-sustainable-city-futures.html

http://ilocostimes.com/current/stories_may26-jun01-14.html

Governance Reforms and Innovations

Organized by the Philippine Society for Public Administration in partnership  with the UP National College of Public Administration and Governance (UP NCPAG), Association of Schools of Public Administration in the Philippines (ASPAP), Philippine Councilors League Legislative Academy (PCLLA), Bukidnon State University (BSU), University of Southeastern Philippines (USEP), Center for Leadership, Communication, and Governance Inc. (CLCGI) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) the 2014 International Conference tackled the latest innovations and governance trends in public administration.

Plenary and panel sessions discussed, debated and explored emerging issues and memes shaping the future of governance education and praxis in the Philippines.

The deepening link between learning (academe) and leading (practice), the future of the Philippine local government code, plausible tensions that could disrupt current national-local governance dynamics, people’s local stories of disaster risk and management, addressing the failures of government and institutions in the area of environment governance, mining laws, the Bangsamoro issue,  federalism and the future of local government amalgamation among others were discussed in the three day conference.

The Philippines Vice-President Jejomar Binay and senators Nene Pimentel and Antonio Trillanes, Mayors Rudy Duterte and Benjamin Abalos, former DILG secretary Rafael Alunan III and Ramon Casiple among others keynoted and led the plenary sessions.

The two-day plenaries featured some of the most innovative local governance platforms in the country.

It also gave public administration schools, think tanks and key industry players (government, ngo’s, people organizations, HEIs, the private sector) the space to assess and critique alternative governance design, worldviews and public policy agenda.

Pop Futures and Some Wicked Notes

Allow me to use the Futures Triangle (FT) to map the contexts,  “pop thoughts” , “wicked ideas and problems” that emerged in the conference. Developed by Sohail Inayatullah, the FT method is a simple tool used by futurists to map the dynamics of the future.  FT could aid researchers and decisionmakers explore future horizons, brainstorm social complexity and analyze the depth of drivers and trends shaping the future and their impacts.

For more about the futures triangle (theory and application) I suggest that you check: http://chrisriedy.me/2012/11/05/the-futures-triangle/ and a case study on the futures of water Australia http://waterrecyclinginvestment.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ISF019_AWRC_T6_Looking-to-the-Future_4-3.pdf

I  used the questions below in mapping some of the contending visions and competing images of Philippine governance futures (past, present and future).

I do not want to be comprehensive and detailed here but would only present some of the general assumptions of speakers, presenters and participants and notes I had at the conference.

 

Credit to http://www.timlonghurst.com/blog/2006/11/20/hot-models-get-me-thinking/
Credit to http://www.timlonghurst.com/blog/2006/11/20/hot-models-get-me-thinking/

Weight of History

  • What is holding us back, or getting in our way?
  • What are the barriers to change?
  • What are the deep structures that resist change?

Pushes of the Present

  • What trends are pushing us towards particular futures?
  • What quantitative drivers and trends are changing the future?

Pulls of the Future

I would take these keywords as the preferred Philippine governance future : democratic, citizen driven, transparent, accountable, Filipinos are living with dignity and honor, self-reliant and respected all over the world.

The disowned governance future  would be: authoritarian, corrupt, elite driven, chaotic, feudal, undisciplined, high risk, colonial, passive. The “crackpot realisms” today, again, would find their way into the future.

Using the papers and presentations shared at  http://www.pspa.ph/. These would be the “weights” (barriers to change), “pushes of the present” (qunatitative drivers and trends) and “pulls of the future” (visions and images of the future) of Philippine public administration and governance:

Weights of History 

  • The concentration of wealth and power in the hands of few families
  • Inefficiency and low productivity
  • Lack of foresight, coherence and long-term planning
  • Pervasive graft and corruption
  • The Bangsamoro conflict
  • Poverty
  • Antiquated public infrastructure
  • Criminality
  • Traffic
  • Weak state institutions
  • Political and Bureaucratic corruption
  • Declining real per capita income

 Pushes of the Present 

  • Glocalization of governance concepts and management systems;
  • Local governments as “islands of hope, creativity and social innovation”
  • Unworthy and unqualified candidates perpetuated by a dysfunctional political party system
  • Huge national bureaucracies that prohibits LGUs to achieve their full potential; as vehicles for national prosperity
  • Local governments are bustling and sleepy towns no more
  • Lack of funds for calamities; National government continues to dispense with calamity budget
  • Expanding powers and functions of LGUs
  • Business friendly cities and better competitiveness index
  • Increasing locally generated revenues
  • Pro-poor governance agenda
  • Energy efficiency and water “savings” initiatives
  • Public spaces as private properties
  • Increasing incidence of child labor
  • “Ginagawang hanapbuhay ang trabaho” (turning one’s work into a livelihood; corrupt pratices)
  • Leadership and political will (The Duterte and Davao City Story of Leadership, Community and Good Governance; the Robredo narrative as an alternative)
  • Cross-sector collaboration
  • Strong volunteerism in the grassroots
  • Grass roots empowerment
  • Drug abuse in the country has reached epidemic proportions (it has penetrated the poor, the police, the politicians and the elite)
  • Local government as learning institutes
  • Php 600 Billion unreleased IRA LGU share (backpay)
  • Weak environmental governance
  • Human rights

Pulls of the Future

  • Merit based / criteria based system for elective and appointive government posts
  • Compensation is equal and/or better pay for government officials than Senior executives in the private sector
  • A Bedeviled Republic (fragmented and confused)
  • Federalism is the way to go!
  • More funds and power to LGUs
  • Empower LGUs to prepare for calamities
  • 50/50 sharing of national revenues (include Customs revenues, Gasoline taxes, wharves, etc)
  • Demand-driven accountability
  • Citizens actions through constructive engagements drives good governance at the national and local levels
  • The Babaylan re-emerges and reinforces local concepts; must create a new spin to women empowerment programs and initiatives
  • Reinvent and re-think the professor. The professor should challenge a dysfunctional governance culture and society (from the ivory tower to community villages)
  • Emergence of language, futures and cultural research in theoretical and applied governance
  • Resilient cities and communities
  • Hybrid forms of regionalisms and culture-bound urbanization
  • Local government amalgamations
  • Faith-based organizations as good governance advocates and initiators
  • Bring government closer to the people

Taking into account these three dimensions of the future, the most plausible alternative future was a corrupt and conflict free, citizen-driven, merit-based and federal system governed governance structure.  Challenging the political and business elite, reinventing the governance professor, addressing poverty, transparency and accountability, social impact investing and engaging the grassroots were noted as imperatives of good governance.

Learnings from Thailand, Japan and South Korea’s Good Governance Discourse and Public Administration Studies

  •  Questions of “values and virtues” must be significant to South Korean public sector management and public service education. Consequential ethics, philosophical thinking, altruism, cultural constructivism, mythology, trust, etc.  can reinvigorate public administration education and policy innovation research. Philosophy could change the way we do public policy analysis and governance design. The Four Rivers Restoration Project in South Korea links philosophy and project implementation;
  • Thailand public administration education and research was institutional, historical and neo-institutional driven. Systems thinking/structural analysis, New Public Administration Management concepts (Hood, Gaebler and New Zealand) dominates Thai governance education and research. The strong IT program of Thaksin Shinawatra led to some drastic restructuring and re-engineering of Thai bureaucracy. Results base management and recruitment innovations in Thai civil service continue to shape Thai governance systems and culture. ASEAN integration, transparency and public trust drives the Thai 2013 to 2018 public sector development agenda.
  • Japan’s model and experiences of local government amalgamation could set new trends on local government futures. New questions emerged, what is the optimal size for LGs in Japan with climate change and disaster risk management in mind? Can local governments really provide public service to local residents with a 100,000 population? How can we cope with LG mergers and amalgamations?  From 71,314  local governments in 1888, Japan today has only around 1,821 LGs.

Where do we go from here?

These questions and quotes from participants and speakers hints at some plausible alternative trajectories:

6a00d8341c56a353ef00e54f10a2aa8833-800wi

“Local governance has now become evidence-based rather than merely advocacy” (LGUs should build new indicators and new measurement systems for good governance. Reputation should be the core of new public management systems.)

download

“Sumikat na si Justine Bieber, wala pa din kaming nakikitang pagbabago sa buhay ng mamayang Pilipino” (poverty, labor exploitation, consumer and human rights as the most critical issue)

images

“What we have are political fraternities and not political parties” (Okay but what about a partyless, compartmentalized, selecto-electo type of democracy?)

images (1)

“Will a shift to a parliamentary system change our behavior” (Will it change us?)

images (2)

“We do have a lot of social plunderers. Fradaulent misuse of pork barrel is tantamount to national sabotage” (Any alternative?)

download (1)

“How can we restore the trust and confidence of our people in government” (?)

images (3)

“Are we really governing?” (Look at our main cities, our mining sites, our comfort rooms, our roads, our schools, our leaders? our airports? our OFWs? … )

images (4)

“A fragmented republic or federalism?” (Bangsamoro? Centralization or Decentralization? Federalism? Parliamentary?)

images (5)

“Should we be radically optimistic?”

images (6)

“We should challenge the status quo through social innovation and engaging the grassroots” (Deepening democratic processes, reinventing governance and sense-making is the triple bottomline)

download (2)

“Hope could transform us and the future of this country”

 

For more about the PSPA conference and proceedings please check http://www.pspa.ph 🙂

1962731_10152447592751693_6184769941589341442_n
Photo credit to the Philippine Society for Public Administration http://www.pspa.ph

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Emerging Cityscapes: The UNESCO/CEF Futures Literacy and Sustainable Cities ForumWorkshop

A storm is brewing in Asia, will Philippine cities transcend beyond the narrative of trauma and disasters? Is there an alternative future for Philippine cities or would it learn from the past to innovate, act and create the preferred story?

Are current strategies enough to transform our cities or do we need to question our assumptions now of continued economic growth and rethink our ways of knowing the city and change the way we imagine our cities and leadership from the big man rule – autocratic, corrupt and isolated to the fresh food market – pluralistic, democratic and participatory?

These are some of the questions that the participants of the UNESCO Resilient Cities, Brighter Futures workshop explored for four days. Using anticipatory thinking and strategic foresight methods, city leaders and experts, researchers, managers, advocates, social scientists, futurists, and consultants from the different parts of the country and the world debated, deconstructed and reconstructed Philippine city futures in a Post-Haiyan era.

The Laoag forum workshop is a part of a broader global foresight project launched by UNESCO and the Rockefeller Foundation on futures literacy and introduce foresight to decision-making, public policy and governance.

The initiative aims to help communities better prepare for the future and assist them to become future-literate. Similar workshops have been held in Oslo Norway; Munich, Germany and Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.

Dr. Kou Hua Chen, futurist from Taiwan, with participants exploring alternative futures for Philippine cities
Dr. Kou Hua Chen, futurist from the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies, Tamkang University, Taiwan co-facilitating the exploration of alternative and preferred futures for Philippine Cities

Reimagining Philippine Cities

To Sohail Inayatullah,  a fellow of the World Futures Studies Federation and the World Academy of Arts and Sciences and the main speaker and facilitator  of the UNESCO future lecture series and knowledge workshop, “cities are fast emerging agents of global policy-making and change.”

(Livestream link of Sohail Inayatullah’s lecture and forum-workshop updates and proceedings powered by SMART Communications Philippines are available here – http://new.livestream.com/accounts/6161035/events/3007612/archives)

And as cities faces multiple challenges like climate change, globalization and demographic shifts, Inayatullah argued that cities need to re-think the context, to be versatile and to be flexible enough to respond, innovate and usher in a new era.

Rigid concepts, models, priorities, worldviews and leadership practices of and in the city that leads to urban poverty, pollution, overcrowding, decay and decline must be questioned. Questioning the future of cities enables communities and leaders to create alternative concepts, frameworks and life-urban interfaces.

To do this, Philippine cities should embark and perhaps invest more aggressively on urban regeneration and knowledge creation projects that increases social, economic and community resilience.

Population drifts from rural to urban are expected to rise and if cities fail to read the weak signals they might end up becoming or repeating the stories of Metro Manila, Baguio and Dagupan cities – living beyond 3, 500% of sustainable levels, caught in the middle income trap and highly vulnerable to climatic changes and exposures.

Mr. Moncini Hinay sharing WWF's and Bank of the Philippines Island Foundation study on Twelve Philippine Cities Business Risk Assessment and the Management of Climate Change Impacts
Mr. Moncini Hinay sharing WWF’s and Bank of the Philippines Island Foundation study on Twelve Philippine Cities Business Risk Assessment and the Management of Climate Change Impacts

In Asia, it is projected that its urban population will double from 1.6 to 3 billion by 2050. Philippine cities have to face up to this emerging population and migration trends but how many of its cities will be able to meet the challenge? Just imagine the social, cultural, environmental, political and economic cost of the ASEAN integration and climate change to an unprepared Philippine city.

To be forewarned is to be forearmed.

Simply put, if you know something beforehand, you can prepare for it.

Being aware of the critical drivers and taking the big picture approach can help cities regenerate and transform in the midst of rapidly evolving challenges.

Strategies and Metaphors to the transform the future

Participants were able to re-imagine the contexts and purposes of Philippine cities in a post-Haiyan plus the ASEAN integration, the rise of Asia, Chindia, etc. scenario.

New narratives, metaphors, images, strategies, policies and programs to achieve the preferred future Philippine cities were proposed. Cities are at the forefront of these solutions and innovations and when they happen it could accelerate inclusive growth, open up new value chains for innovation and better city living conditions.

The low hanging fruit was the Smart city.

Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of urban systems, social cohesion, innovation, infrastructure, architecture, energy, transport, national and local governance and the participation of the media, academia and the non-profit sector was essential to creating the smart city.

We have to be smart enough to see the intersection of all the drivers mentioned to create the smart city that we want participants noted. Changing the way we live, work and play in urban environments requires asking the unasked questions. Integrating or applying the best tools like anticipatory thinking and foresight can improve urban planning practices and innovation.

Technology is a critical driver to this type of city.

The metaphor was arangkada. Downside however was the tusong-matsing – a city trying to catch up with its neighbors, economic growth driven, getting smarter but stupidier.

Dr. Virginia Miralao, Secretary-General of the UNESCO National Commission of the Philippines delivered the keynote address
Dr. Virginia Miralao, Secretary-General of the UNESCO National Commission of the Philippines on the need to explore new imaginings and city concepts in a post-Haiyan era

 The G4 city. This is the Laoagueno version of the smart and green city.

Here the city is smarter and wiser.

The green worldview of inclusive interaction, collective emergence and local creativities informs the G4 city. From pure gold in 2012 to the pure and interactive trees, from hypermart (big man rule driven) to the fresh food market (pluralistic, participatory and democratic) city in 2030.

The city’s strategies create the conditions for the greeny Ilocano way of life and lifestyle to thrive; the system and the city and its people finding their own path.

The city is emergent and organic, alive, breathable, walkable and liveable as well safe and inviting for brilliant people and ideas in this city scenario.

The metaphor was the garden of trees and the ecosystems of life.

Laoag emerges as the smart and green capital of the Philippines.

The city is shaped by her residents, community organizers, musicians, ecologists, settlers, farmers and artists and Pamulinawen finds her heart and wooed by a French artist and entrepreneur.

Laoag is globally connected and emerges as a global brand for city resilience and transformation by 2030.

Laoag City Mayor Hon. Chevyyle Farinas sharing Laoag City's resilience building approach and creating valuable future for Laoag
Laoag City Mayor Hon. Chevyyle Farinas sharing Laoag City’s resilience building approach and creating valuable future for Laoag
Dr. Sohail Inayatullah on Futures Thinking and Strategy Development, UNESCO Future Lecture Series Laoag Edition
Dr. Sohail Inayatullah on Futures Thinking and Strategy Development, UNESCO Future Lecture Series, 2014

The Bayanihan City – bayan (community, connectivity), bayani (hero catalyst, peer to peer, sharing economy), ani (wealth, next generation inclusive and sustainability).

Here, Philippine cities get transformed by resiliency and natural disasters.

An empowered, pragmatic and a climate responsive city is created in 2030.

Cities become a prototype, a model for disaster risk reduction and management.

The Japanese proverb that says a bamboo that bends is better than the oak that resist was the myth.

City’s in this context have future-proof flexibility and have adaptable spaces that accommodate multiple changes and challenges.

The city is bayani as it is also generationally inclusive. It accounts and imagines the need, the resources and the opportunity required by future generations. The future generation becomes a part of the policy discourse, planning and urban city design.

From the city of isa, isahan at naisahan to the city narrative of bayan, bayani and ani, Philippine cities creates new hero icons, stories, proverbs and opportunities for the future.

The Healthy, Interactive Living City. 

The city takes the title for fit and healthy living.

Philippine cities invest and create the healthy, living cities and some would even take the top spot in an annual global ranking of healthy cities.

The indicator here was the walk or the bike score, number of yoga and meditation practitioners and decline in the number of citizens suffering from chronic health problems such as diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity. Fruit consumption rate, investment in curative healthcare, number of homeopathy shops, tea shops, number of farmer markets, the decline in the number of patients were significant and are indicators of the healthy living cities.

Physical infrastructures are designed and invested on based on fitness and health impact index.

A healthy city strengthens personal and social immune systems.

National Economic Development Authority Regional Director Maryanne Darauay the result of their futures triangle  analysis on Philippine City futures.
National Economic Development Authority Regional Director Maryanne Darauay presenting their  futures triangle analysis/output on Philippine City futures.

Dorothy and the Wizard of Oz

From the King (the king can do no wrong, father knows best) and the Unruly Citizen of the past and present (bahala na, short term oriented, corruptible citizens) to Dorothy (creative, inclusive and emergent) and the Wizard of Oz (a future world designed by her community and friends, playful and organic and generative), people and local governments leads the way in the diversification and creation of new Philippine cities.

Participants aspired for a city and systems that are people oriented, novel and nonconventional.

They want the Filipino to prosper and participate in creating the preferred.

Restrictive Factors

Too much democracy, closed economy that benefits only the ruling elite, feudal culture, the nation-state, hierarchy, strong power distance index, the raping of natural resources, the middle income trap, short-termism, systemic corruption, asyong aksaya (corrupt and wasteful leadership patterns trends), the alamat of ibong adarna (tinutulugan ang kalamidad at oportunidad) are weights of history, the restrictive factors and barriers to the preferred future.

On behalf of Dr. Riel Miller and the UNESCO Headquarters, Ms. Linda Tinio Le-Douarin explained the context and purposes of the UNESCO forum-workshop
On behalf of Dr. Riel Miller and the UNESCO Headquarters, Ms. Linda Tinio Le-Douarin explained the context and purposes of the UNESCO forum-workshop

The future is an active aspect of the present

Like the past, the future is an active aspect of the present. It is the ‘forward looking equivalent of history’. Using it as a medium to expand planning, policy and governance, the future can provide us practical and imaginative space to create and enact the future today.

Futures thinking can help us reveal the unknown unknowns and imagine multiple alternatives and choices. One does not need to be an expert to take part in futures thinking and strategy development.

Thank you! Thank you!

Now I would like to personally thank Mayor Chevyyle Farinas and Northwestern University President Liza Nicolas, the Northwestern University community and the Laoag City Government for their overwhelming and generous support.

Also, the futures team of the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies at Tamkang University and the University of Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies and the International Society of Heal Being Studies at Chung Ang University, Seoul South Korea, Dr. Shunji-jie, Dr. Kou Hua Chen, Dr. Meimei Song, Dr. Jiang Bang Deng, Dr. Hyun Ryul Park, Mark Alexander, Cesar Villanueva, Dr. Mahar Lagmay, Architect Jun Palafox, Dr. Mario De Los Reyes, Dr. Merlita Panganiban, Mr. Moncini Hinay, Jerome Escobar, Atty. Ferdinand Nicolas, Dr. Rudy Bareng, Mayor Dolly Clementd and Vice Mayor Jessie Galano, Ilocos Times Publisher Jay Ramos and Mr. Mitch Esmino, the City Tourism Office of Vigan and the UNESCO National Commission of the Philippines Dr. Virginia Miralao and Ms. Emmy Yanga thank you so much!

Event photos below.

Dr. Shunjie Jie, futurist and professor at the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies, Tamkang University,  shares a laugh with the group as they explored alternative futures for Imus City using emerging issues analysis
Dr. Shunjie Jie, futurist and professor at the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies, Tamkang University, shares a light moment with the group as they explored alternative futures for Imus City using emerging issues analysis
DSC_8321
Mark Alexander, Manoa School of Futures Studies, University of Hawaii explains Dator’s Laws of the Future and the HRCFS approach to futures studies, current projects, etc.
NWU Laoag President Liza Nicolas and VPs Dr. Rudy Bareng and Atty. Ferdinand Nicolas with Architect and Urban Planner Jun Palafox @ the Forum-Workshop
NWU Laoag President Liza Nicolas and VPs Dr. Rudy Bareng and Atty. Ferdinand Nicolas with Architect and Urban Planner Jun Palafox @ the Forum-Workshop
Architect Jun Palafox, Dr. Mahar Lagmay, Moncini Hinay, Dr. Mario De Los Reyes and Dr. Rudy Bareng answers some questions from participants during the open forum.
Architect Jun Palafox, Dr. Mahar Lagmay, Moncini Hinay, Dr. Mario De Los Reyes and Dr. Rudy Bareng answers some questions from participants during the open forum.
Cesar Villanueva from the World Futures Studies Federation chaired the futures studies morning panel
Cesar Villanueva from the World Futures Studies Federation chaired the panel Perspectives on Foresight and Learning from Experience featuring the Manoa School of Futures Studies, the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies, Tamkang University; the International Heal Being Society, South Korea and the Center for Engaged Foresight, Philippines
Dr. Jiang Bang Deng discussing TKUs futures studies program and current projects.
Dr. Jiang Bang Deng shares TKUs experiences, the GIFS futures studies program, current and upcoming projects.
Panel on the Local Government view on resilience building and disaster risk reduction and management that featured lessons and best practices from the City of Laoag, City of Makati and the Province of Albay
Panel on the Local Government view on resilience building and disaster risk reduction and management that featured lessons and best practices from the City of Laoag, City of Makati and the Province of Albay
Panel speakers and chairs for the first day of the UNESCO forum-workshop on futures studies, strategic foresight, resilience building and disaster risk reduction and management, city futures
Panel speakers and chairs for the ceremonial photo ops
Dr. Hyun Ryul Park on the advent of Heal Being Cities and Heal-Based Technology for sustainable city futures.
Dr. Hyun Ryul Park on the advent of Heal Being Cities and Heal-Based Technology for sustainable city futures.
Dr. Mahar Lagmay on Project NOAH, Science and Technology and DRRM
Dr. Mahar Lagmay on Project NOAH, Science and Technology and DRRM
Urban Planner Arch. Jun Palafox on Sustainable City Futures
Urban Planner Arch. Jun Palafox on Sustainable City Futures
Dean Mario De Los Reyes of UP School of Urban and Regional Planning on DRRM integration and comprehensive land use planning
Dean Mario De Los Reyes of UP School of Urban and Regional Planning on DRRM integration and comprehensive land use planning
Groups deconstructed and reconstructed plausible city futures during UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Groups deconstructed and reconstructed plausible city futures during UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Groups deconstructed and reconstructed plausible city futures during UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Groups deconstructed and reconstructed plausible city futures during UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Groups deconstructed and reconstructed plausible city futures during UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Groups deconstructed and reconstructed plausible city futures during UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Dr. Meimei Song, futurist and profesor at the Graduate Institute of Future Studies, Tamkang University co-facilitates the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Dr. Meimei Song, futurist and profesor at the Graduate Institute of Future Studies, Tamkang University co-facilitates the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and the Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and the Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and the Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and the Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and the Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Macrohistory and the Sarkar game at the UNESCO Knowledge Lab Workshop
Shiela Castillo, climate reality presenter, shares her views on DRRM and city futures
Shiela Castillo, climate reality presenter, shares her views on DRRM and sustainability
DSC_8870
Learnings, possible next steps and takeaways
Learnings, possible next steps and takeaways
Learnings, possible next steps and takeaways
DSC_8988
Learnings, possible next steps and takeaways
Learnings, possible next steps and takeaways
Learnings, possible next steps and takeaways
DSC_8998
Learnings, possible next steps and takeaways

Lots of photos here –  https://www.flickr.com/photos/125022124@N05/

and related links –

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/events/programme-meetings/?tx_browser_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=28596&cHash=6f1a262388

http://www.unesco.gov.ph/content/article/Home

http://unesco.gov.ph/content/article/Social%20and%20Human%20Sciences